 |
ExtraHop vs Gigamon
August 06, 2023 | Author: Michael Stromann
15
ExtraHop provides cloud-native cybersecurity solutions to help enterprises detect and respond to advanced threats—before they compromise your business.
12
Gigamon delivers network-derived intelligence to your cloud, security, and observability tools.
See also:
Top 10 Intrusion Detection Systems
Top 10 Intrusion Detection Systems
ExtraHop and Gigamon are two distinct network monitoring and visibility solutions that cater to different aspects of network management. ExtraHop is a real-time network analysis platform that provides deep visibility into network performance, application behavior, and security threats. It passively analyzes network traffic, collecting and processing data in real-time to offer insights into application performance, user behavior, and potential security issues. ExtraHop is known for its ease of deployment and user-friendly interface, making it suitable for organizations that prioritize real-time visibility and actionable insights for optimizing network performance and troubleshooting application issues.
On the other hand, Gigamon is primarily a network traffic visibility and packet broker solution. It acts as an intermediary between network infrastructure and monitoring tools, aggregating and filtering network traffic to ensure relevant data is sent to the appropriate tools for analysis. Gigamon is designed to handle high volumes of network traffic and distribute it efficiently to various security and monitoring tools. It is well-suited for larger enterprises with complex network infrastructures that require centralized control and intelligent traffic distribution to optimize tool utilization and enhance overall network visibility.
The key difference between ExtraHop and Gigamon lies in their core functionalities. ExtraHop is a comprehensive network analysis platform that offers real-time insights into application performance and security threats through passive traffic analysis. On the other hand, Gigamon focuses on network traffic visibility and packet brokering, allowing organizations to efficiently manage and distribute network data to various monitoring tools. While both solutions contribute to enhanced network performance and security, ExtraHop is more suited for organizations seeking real-time visibility and detailed analytics of network and application behavior, while Gigamon is ideal for enterprises with complex networks that require intelligent traffic distribution and centralized visibility management. Organizations should consider their specific needs and infrastructure requirements when choosing between these two solutions.
See also: Top 10 Intrusion Detection Systems
On the other hand, Gigamon is primarily a network traffic visibility and packet broker solution. It acts as an intermediary between network infrastructure and monitoring tools, aggregating and filtering network traffic to ensure relevant data is sent to the appropriate tools for analysis. Gigamon is designed to handle high volumes of network traffic and distribute it efficiently to various security and monitoring tools. It is well-suited for larger enterprises with complex network infrastructures that require centralized control and intelligent traffic distribution to optimize tool utilization and enhance overall network visibility.
The key difference between ExtraHop and Gigamon lies in their core functionalities. ExtraHop is a comprehensive network analysis platform that offers real-time insights into application performance and security threats through passive traffic analysis. On the other hand, Gigamon focuses on network traffic visibility and packet brokering, allowing organizations to efficiently manage and distribute network data to various monitoring tools. While both solutions contribute to enhanced network performance and security, ExtraHop is more suited for organizations seeking real-time visibility and detailed analytics of network and application behavior, while Gigamon is ideal for enterprises with complex networks that require intelligent traffic distribution and centralized visibility management. Organizations should consider their specific needs and infrastructure requirements when choosing between these two solutions.
See also: Top 10 Intrusion Detection Systems
