Checkmarx vs Veracode

November 09, 2023 | Author: Michael Stromann
14
Checkmarx
Checkmarx enables large-scale enterprises to secure every phase of development for every application while balancing the dynamic needs of CISOs, security, and development teams.
14
Veracode
Veracode's mission is to ensure that software is secure from the start. With our platform you can continuously find and fix security flaws throughout the software development lifecycle. Veracode brings security and development teams together.
Checkmarx and Veracode are both prominent players in the application security testing landscape, offering distinct approaches to identifying and mitigating security vulnerabilities in software code. One fundamental difference lies in their testing methodologies. Checkmarx primarily utilizes static application security testing (SAST), scanning the source code for potential vulnerabilities without executing the program. It is known for its thorough static analysis, identifying complex security issues early in the development process. Veracode, on the other hand, employs a combination of static analysis (SAST) and dynamic analysis (DAST) to assess applications at both the source code and runtime levels. This hybrid approach provides a more comprehensive view of an application's security posture.

Another key distinction is in their deployment models. Checkmarx offers flexibility with both on-premises and cloud-based deployment options. This flexibility allows organizations to choose a deployment model that aligns with their infrastructure and security policies. Veracode, on the other hand, operates primarily as a cloud-based solution, providing scalability and ease of deployment. The cloud-based nature of Veracode simplifies updates and maintenance tasks, making it an attractive choice for organizations looking for a scalable and easily accessible security testing solution.

See also: Top 10 Application Security Software
Author: Michael Stromann
Michael is an expert in IT Service Management, IT Security and software development. With his extensive experience as a software developer and active involvement in multiple ERP implementation projects, Michael brings a wealth of practical knowledge to his writings. Having previously worked at SAP, he has honed his expertise and gained a deep understanding of software development and implementation processes. Currently, as a freelance developer, Michael continues to contribute to the IT community by sharing his insights through guest articles published on several IT portals. You can contact Michael by email stromann@liventerprise.com