Checkmarx vs Sonar

Checkmarx and Sonar are two valuable tools in the realm of application security testing, with distinct focuses on security and code quality, respectively. One significant difference is in their primary objectives. Checkmarx is renowned for its emphasis on security testing, specifically static application security testing (SAST). It thoroughly analyzes the source code, identifying and remediating security vulnerabilities early in the development process. On the other hand, Sonar, also known as SonarQube, concentrates on code quality and static code analysis. It provides developers with insights into code smells, bugs, and adherence to coding standards, fostering a continuous improvement approach to code quality.

Integration into the development workflow is another key distinction. Checkmarx seamlessly integrates with various development environments and continuous integration/continuous deployment (CI/CD) pipelines, allowing developers to incorporate security checks seamlessly into their workflows. It provides real-time feedback, enabling quick remediation of security issues. Sonar is typically integrated into the CI/CD pipeline as well, but its focus on code quality means it provides developers with insights into the overall health of the codebase, helping them maintain clean, maintainable code throughout the development lifecycle.

See also: Top 10 Application Security Software