 |
Checkmarx vs Contrast Security
November 09, 2023 | Author: Michael Stromann
14
Checkmarx enables large-scale enterprises to secure every phase of development for every application while balancing the dynamic needs of CISOs, security, and development teams.
5
Contrast Security is the leader in modernized application security, embedding code analysis and attack prevention directly into software.
Checkmarx and Contrast Security are both leading solutions in the application security landscape, but they diverge in their primary methodologies and focus areas.
Checkmarx is a widely-used static application security testing (SAST) tool that primarily focuses on analyzing the application's source code for security vulnerabilities. It conducts a thorough examination of the codebase, identifying potential issues such as SQL injection, cross-site scripting, and other vulnerabilities. Checkmarx provides developers with actionable insights during the coding phase, allowing them to address security concerns early in the development lifecycle. Its static analysis approach enables comprehensive vulnerability detection, making it well-suited for organizations with a strong emphasis on secure coding practices.
In contrast, Contrast Security distinguishes itself with a runtime application self-protection (RASP) approach. Unlike Checkmarx's static analysis, Contrast operates within the application runtime, monitoring and protecting against security threats in real-time. This allows Contrast Security to detect and block attacks dynamically, providing continuous security coverage. The RASP technology is particularly effective in environments with rapid development cycles, such as DevOps, where immediate vulnerability identification and remediation are crucial.
See also: Top 10 Application Security Software
Checkmarx is a widely-used static application security testing (SAST) tool that primarily focuses on analyzing the application's source code for security vulnerabilities. It conducts a thorough examination of the codebase, identifying potential issues such as SQL injection, cross-site scripting, and other vulnerabilities. Checkmarx provides developers with actionable insights during the coding phase, allowing them to address security concerns early in the development lifecycle. Its static analysis approach enables comprehensive vulnerability detection, making it well-suited for organizations with a strong emphasis on secure coding practices.
In contrast, Contrast Security distinguishes itself with a runtime application self-protection (RASP) approach. Unlike Checkmarx's static analysis, Contrast operates within the application runtime, monitoring and protecting against security threats in real-time. This allows Contrast Security to detect and block attacks dynamically, providing continuous security coverage. The RASP technology is particularly effective in environments with rapid development cycles, such as DevOps, where immediate vulnerability identification and remediation are crucial.
See also: Top 10 Application Security Software
